Understanding China: about censorship
Imagine yourself to be a western journalist and you have to write something that involves understanding censorship in China. Mission impossible, it seems.
The news fact in a news article in a Dutch main stream news paper is the fact that "China silences media reports about train crash investigation". The article, based in information leaked to the China Digital Times website, clearly suggests that it is forbidden for journalists to follow any other information in this matter other than the official info.
This all sounds very North Korean, but as the article mentions, the imposed censorship does not seem to work, as some media do still report on the issue. For example the English languaged Global Times. What the article does not mention is that, at least if I am correct, the Global Times is state controlled. And in that case censorship might be a bit more subtle than the news article reads.
Also, the article says that bloggers still cover the issue, and that the internet if full of rumors about an aledged cover up about the train crash. There are supposed to be pictures on the internet in which workers are burrying car wrecks. Now, if you look at the picture of the accident scene (left, same picture as in the article), it is crystal clear that there is now way a car can be involved in the train crash. High speed trains generally run on elevated tracks (bridges if you will), cars don't just fly up to them. Perhaps the AFP journalist that wrote this article does not know China very well?
Just a tool
The problem is: the western reception of censorship is totally different than the Chinese reception of the word.
In the western world, censorship is something bad. It is repressive, and used by evil forces that don't want the truth to come out. Censorship is a threat to one of the western mind's most loved human right: freedom of information or freedom of press.
In China, censorship is a tool that governments and journalists can use to prevent choas and madness in society. It can prevent possibly dangerous rumors from spreading, rumors that can harm society and the people. Free press means that one can publish anything, no matter if it's true or not. In this respect, censorship is good.
This difference in perception is totally ignored in western news articles about Chinese censorship. Apparently, the world's leading press agencies see their interpretation as universal, as the only truth. Even though Chinese authorities and media act on the other perception of censorship.
It makes me wonder what is more important to western press: trying to understand and publish stuff like it really is, looking at them from different possible angles, or just playing to the so called universal truth according to western minds?
